Hindustan Times Reviews Buddha in a Traffic Jam
| Buddha in a Traffic Jam | |
|---|---|
 Official release poster of Buddha in a Traffic Jam | |
| Directed past | Vivek Agnihotri |
| Written by | Vivek Agnihotri |
| Produced past |
|
| Starring |
|
| Cinematography | Attar Singh Saini |
| Edited by | Sattyajit Gazmer |
| Music by | Rohit Sharma |
| Production |
|
| Distributed by | Carnival Motion Pictures |
| Release dates |
|
| Country | Bharat |
| Languages |
|
Buddha in a Traffic Jam is a 2016 Indian political thriller film written and directed by Vivek Agnihotri.[1] The film released nationwide on xiii May 2016.
The film narrates a tale of inter-meddling of academia with corruption and maoism.[2]
Plot [edit]
Vikram Pandit (Arunoday Singh) is a happy-go-lucky management student from a business school in India. He becomes an overnight awareness afterwards a successful social media entrada against the radical fundamentalism of moral policing in India. Little did Vikram know that he was about to become a role of a plot that would risk his life and the nation. He gets entangled between two facets of India—Socialism and Commercialism, both of which are deeply rooted in isolated corners of the country.
Somewhere deep within the jungles, flagrant conspirators were gearing upwardly to maim the Country. They had established links with the patrician society. Vikram's net entrada pulls him into a very deep spider web of conspiracy.
The pic revolves around Vikram's survival in the sinister designs of institution.
Bandage [edit]
- Arunoday Singh as Vikram Pandit[three]
- Mahi Gill as Charu Siddhu
- Anupam Kher as Professor Ranjan Batki
- Pallavi Joshi as Sheetal Batki, married woman of Ranjan Batki.[4]
- Vivek Vaswani
- Anchal Dwivedi
- Gopal M Singh equally Naxal chief
- Indal Singh equally Nanhe Singh, political leader
Production [edit]
Development [edit]
Nisha Susan of Pink Chaddi Campaign fame recalled someone from Indian School of Business, claiming to work at a motion picture-incubator having emailed her a few years back, nearly a prospective flick centered on her entrada.[v] The plot went (roughly):[five]
A young idealistic student is in a bar, where a bunch of right wing goons assault girls. The pupil vanquishes the goons and follows upward with a Facebook campaign confronting misogyny, which commands considerable fame. He is afterwards approached by the Naxals who convert and inquire him to mold the urban youth in Maoist credo; by the virtue of his gained fame and charisma.
The part nigh Naxals was a artistic addition, and Susan had replied that while he was free to make a flick about the themes, she constitute it surprising that a campaign which was run by numerous women in reality was to be run past a single man in the picture show.[5] He replied that a woman-run entrada was patently non realistic.[5]
In an interview with Hindustan Times, Vivek said that while he was delivering a lecture at Indian Schoolhouse of Business concern most Naxal influence in academia, the students suggested to sketch out a 10-minute short film.[six] That idea gradually morphed into the thoughts of producing a full-fledged feature film.[6] Agnihotri has asserted of the flick to be modeled on his own life[6] [7] [8] though one of his co-producers has denied it.[ix]
Vivek and the students went on a drive to collect funds before coming together Suresh Chukkapalli who agreed to produce it.[half dozen] Vivek felt that convincing producers to support a non-star content-driven movie was difficult.[10]
Casting [edit]
Filming [edit]
The title was chosen equally a metaphor alluding to the mayhem that engulfs the students of diverse universities.[6] Around eighty per cent of the motion-picture show was shot at Indian School of Concern (ISB), Hyderabad[vi] and the total upkeep was about five crore INR.[9]
Soundtrack [edit]
Pallavi Joshi fabricated her singing debut in the movie with the song Chand Roz, a ghazal written by Faiz Ahmad Faiz.[xi]
Bout and release [edit]
Certification [edit]
The Central Board of Motion picture Certification passed the film without whatsoever cuts.[7] Agnihotri claimed that sure objectionable content including the likes of farthermost language and extreme sexual practice scenes were allowed to stay as the board members were sympathetic to the bulletin of the motion-picture show.[7] [12]
University tour and controversies [edit]
Reportedly, whilst many distributors initially promised to distribute the film, many later backed out on grounds of the controversial topic.[vi] Barjatya productions came to the assistance[13] but afterward withdraw their offering. He then chose to tour across different colleges and universities across the nation and screen the picture show; due to an alleged lack of marketing capital.[half-dozen] The film premiered at IIT Bombay on vi Apr 2016.[14] These screening of the films with the help of political unions, who have had a reputation for instigating violence,[15] accept been criticized.[9] and the screenings have been protested against.[12]
Jadavpur University [edit]
A screening of the film, which was supposed to be accompanied by Vivek and Anupam, was scheduled to be held at the Triguna Sen Auditorium, Jadavpur University by a grouping "Think Republic of india", backed by a right wing student matrimony-- Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP).[2] [16] The screening was cancelled after the alumni association withdrew their permission, citing the model lawmaking of conduct, which was in forcefulness due to the concurrent state elections.[16] Agnihotri was greeted with black flags and he alleged that he had been gheraoed and manhandled whilst his motorcar was damaged.[sixteen] [17] [8] [18] The screening was thereafter rescheduled to be held in an open-air format simply did not take any permission from the concerned authorities.[xix] It was accordingly asked to be stopped past the registrar but Vivek chose to proceed.[two] Anticipating trouble in case of enabling a forced closure, the authorities did not arbitrate further.[xx] This led to a subsequent fracas wherein the students claim that several outsiders from a right wing educatee wedlock-- Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP) turned the result into a political rally, sloganeering along right-fly agendas and assaulting those who dissented confronting the "divisive content" of the film.[16] [9] Four of the outsiders (three of whom belonged to ABVP and the other was a professor of Bangabasi College) were alleged to have sexually molested women students and were kept within the university estate office by the students.[2] [xx] They were rescued after the vice-chancellor, registrar and other senior officials intervened, awaiting which an FIR was lodged by the university authority against them.[2] Vivek and other ABVP leaders summarily rejected the allegations of molestation;[8] which were subsequently farther criticized.[9] Vivek also blamed the students as naxalites enrolled in an institute where everything happened except education.[12]
The side by side mean solar day, JU students held a march beyond the urban center chanting slogans of 'Azadi' from RSS and BJP, the parent organizations of ABVP and against "saffronisation" of the nation.[21] [22] [23] ABVP filed a counter FIR and asserted that they volition send a detailed report to the home ministry virtually the "pro-naxalite anti-national" activities that took place in the campus which were supposedly advocated past pro-left students.[22] [24] They also sought for physical assault on the university students.[23]
The film was finally released on 13 May 2016 by Rajshri Productions in a limited number of theatres.[6] [25] The Indian Express failed to annotation any 'buzz' in the market.[25]
Reception [edit]
Critical [edit]
Sarit Ray of Hindustan Times rated the picture 1/5 and commented information technology to exist a thoroughly unconvincing propaganda film that resembled an amateur and laughable attempt at film making.[26] Suprateek Chaterjee of HuffPost deemed it to exist a "often ridiculous propaganda piece" for the right fly.[27] Raja Sen of Rediff.Com noted it to be a hollow and senseless product of incompetent film-making; that failed the standards of even existence an constructive propaganda picture.[28] Mohar Basu of Times of India rated it ii out of five stars, criticizing the flimsy plot and Vivek's limited knowledge of the relevant bug.[29] Nandini Ramnath of Curl.in criticized the film as a zeitgeist moving picture of the Modi era, that severely lacked artistic merit and had a ridiculous plot.[thirty] Kunal Guha of Mumbai Mirror rated it 1.v out of five, noting that the picture show's plot deteriorated with ensuing fourth dimension and at the end, induced nix more than a piddling headache whilst sinking Vivek'due south last ditch attempt to redeem himself.[31] Surabhi Redkar of Koimoi.com rated it 1.five out of v and remarked it to be a propaganda film with a flimsy plot, that stood far from objectivity and which sought to sell a detail mindset.[32] Rachit Gupta of Filmfare criticized the motion picture as suffering from lackluster plot, half-heartedly written scripts, mediocre screenplay, inconsistent performances and poor direction that did go absolutely nowhere.[33] Aniruddha Guha at MensXP.com rated the motion picture 1.5 out of 5 and noted information technology to be a mixture of haphazard storytelling and poor screenplay that stuck to an uni-dimensional narrative, throughout: Leftists are the bad guys. [34] Rajyasree Sen of Newslaundry.com noted that the sole reasons for showing the motion picture in universities could be as a reminder for the students to not fund or exist involved in cinema so shoddy, in whose description the words 'convoluted' and 'childish' proved to be an understatement.[9]
Rohit Bhatnagar of Deccan Chronicle though praised the film equally an boggling effort of shedding light on the cached political issues of the nation and praised multiple aspects of the film making.[35]
Box role [edit]
The film did non perform well at the box office.[36]
Book [edit]
Agnihotri later on wrote a book titled Urban Naxals: The Making of Buddha in a Traffic Jam almost his experiences whilst making the film.[37] [38] The volume led to his framing of the term Urban Naxals.[39]
References [edit]
- ^ "Convincing producers for non-star film difficult: Vivek Agnihotri". 7 April 2016.
- ^ a b c d e "Plot thickens at Jadavpur Academy, clashes over picture screening". Hindustan Times. seven May 2016. Retrieved 15 March 2019.
- ^ "Buddha In A Traffic Jam 2016 Movie News, Wallpapers, Songs & Videos". Bollywood Hungama.
- ^ Tankha, Madhur (thirteen November 2014). "Back after a pause". The Hindu. ISSN 0971-751X. Retrieved fifteen March 2019.
- ^ a b c d "Everything About Me & Arunoday Singh that You Wanted to Know but Were Afraid to Ask". The Ladies Finger. 17 May 2016. Retrieved 15 March 2019.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i Dundoo, Sangeetha Devi (18 April 2016). "Neither left, nor correct". The Hindu. ISSN 0971-751X. Retrieved 15 March 2019.
- ^ a b c "'Buddha in a Traffic Jam' passed past censors without any cuts: Director Vivek Agnihotri". The Indian Express. 13 April 2016. Retrieved ix May 2016.
- ^ a b c "Nowhere in India do students behave the fashion they did at JU: Vivek Agnihotri". The Times of Bharat . Retrieved 15 March 2019.
- ^ a b c d e f "Sabki Dhulai". Newslaundry . Retrieved 15 March 2019.
- ^ "Convincing producers for non-star moving picture difficult: Vivek Agnihotri". The Indian Express. vii April 2016. Retrieved 16 March 2019.
- ^ "Pallavi Joshi makes her singing debut in 'Buddha In A Traffic Jam'". The Indian Express. 29 April 2016. Retrieved 15 March 2019.
- ^ a b c "'In JU, in that location is everything except education': 'Buddha in a Traffic Jam' director Vivek Agnihotri- Entertainment News, Firstpost". Firstpost. 11 May 2016. Retrieved 16 March 2019.
- ^ Thakkar, Mehul Due south. (10 April 2016). "Barjatyas bails Vivek Agnihotri's 'Buddha' out of a 'Jam'". Deccan Chronicle . Retrieved xv March 2019.
- ^ "'Buddha in a Traffic Jam' premiered at IIT Bombay". The Times of India . Retrieved 16 March 2019.
- ^ "Ramjas Not Solitary, ABVP Has a Legacy of Violence and Vandalism". The Quint. 23 February 2017. Retrieved 15 March 2019.
- ^ a b c d "Anupam Kher's 'Buddha in a Traffic Jam' screened in open air amongst protests on Jadavpur campus". The Indian Express. vii May 2016. Retrieved xv March 2019.
- ^ "'They Are Breaking The Car Apart' Tweets Buddha In A Traffic Jam Manager At Jadavpur University". NDTV.com . Retrieved fifteen March 2019.
- ^ "Vivek Agnihotri recounts his Jadavpur University ordeal: No room for the Right- Entertainment News, Firstpost". Firstpost. 13 May 2016. Retrieved 15 March 2019.
- ^ "Jadavpur VC says film was screened in open air without prior permission". The Indian Express. 7 May 2016. Retrieved 15 March 2019.
- ^ a b "4 ABVP, BJP workers booked for 'molesting' Jadavpur univ students". Hindustan Times. seven May 2016. Retrieved xv March 2019.
- ^ "Students protestation on Kolkata's streets". The Hindu. Special Correspondent. seven May 2016. ISSN 0971-751X. Retrieved 15 March 2019.
{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: others (link) - ^ a b "Jadavpur univ students, ABVP on collision class day after clashes". Hindustan Times. 7 May 2016. Retrieved 15 March 2019.
- ^ a b "Volition chop off legs of anti-nationals in JU, say ABVP activists". Hindustan Times. 9 May 2016. Retrieved 15 March 2019.
- ^ "Jadavpur University hub of anti-nationals, VC supporting them: BJP". Hindustan Times. 7 May 2016. Retrieved fifteen March 2019.
- ^ a b "Azhar, Buddha In A Traffic Jam and Dear Dad release at box-office today". The Indian Express. thirteen May 2016. Retrieved xv March 2019.
- ^ "Buddha In A Traffic Jam review: All hype, no substance". Hindustan Times. 14 May 2016. Retrieved 13 March 2019.
- ^ "'Buddha In A Traffic Jam' Review: A Oft Ridiculous Propaganda Piece". HuffPost India. xiii May 2016. Retrieved 13 March 2019.
- ^ "Review: Buddha In A Traffic Jam makes me feel pitiful for Indian Correct Wingers". Rediff . Retrieved 13 March 2019.
- ^ Buddha In A Traffic Jam, Story, Trailers , retrieved thirteen March 2019
- ^ Ramnath, Nandini. "Film review: 'Buddha in a Traffic Jam' has the perfect business plan for revolution". Roll.in . Retrieved 13 March 2019.
- ^ Guha, Kunal GuhaKunal (17 September 2016). "Film review: Buddha In A Traffic Jam". Mumbai Mirror . Retrieved 14 March 2019.
- ^ Redkar, Surabhi (12 May 2016). "Buddha In A Traffic Jam Review". Koimoi . Retrieved 14 March 2019.
- ^ "Movie Review: Buddha In A Traffic Jam". filmfare.com . Retrieved fourteen March 2019.
- ^ "Picture show Review: 'Buddha In A Traffic Jam' Is Neither Smart Nor Entertaining". mensxp.com . Retrieved 14 March 2019.
- ^ Bhatnagar, Rohit (12 May 2016). "Buddha In A Traffic Jam movie review: An unusual tale of social awakening". Deccan Chronicle . Retrieved 14 March 2019.
- ^ "Arunoday Singh: I don't consider myself any less successful right at present". Hindustan Times. 26 April 2018. Retrieved 15 March 2019.
- ^ "Mithun Chakraborty gives a thumbs upwards to Vivek Agnihotri's book 'Urban Naxals'". 11 June 2018.
- ^ "Vivek Agnihotri's 'Urban Naxals' catches Matrimony Home Government minister Rajnath Singh's centre".
- ^ "'Ghoul' and the Spectre of Totalitarianism". Economic and Political Weekly. 50, l, fifty, 50, 50 (23, 23, 23, 23, 23): seven–8. v June 2015.
External links [edit]
- Buddha in a Traffic Jam at IMDb
- Buddha in a Traffic Jam at Bollywood Hungama
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddha_in_a_Traffic_Jam
0 Response to "Hindustan Times Reviews Buddha in a Traffic Jam"
Post a Comment